AUDVERA · START WHERE THE AUDIT STARTS
Type the audit. The engagement skeleton — risks ranked, procedures sourced, evidence drafted — is waiting in your trial before your team's first standup.
No credit card. No procurement form. 14 days inside the actual product.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.
One subscription, both products
Audit management and controls / GRC ship in a single subscription and share one linked model — a risk tested in an engagement updates the register that governs the control. Incumbents sell these as separate modules, each with its own line item.
AI-first from the ground up — not bolted onto a decade-old GRC core.
Product 1
Product 2
One connected system for roughly half the median cost of legacy GRC.
Legacy GRC platforms carry a median ACV around $46K–$60K (independent procurement data). Audvera Team, 10 auditors: $24,000/yr — with both products included, not gated per module.
$24,000/yr
Team · 10 auditors
The operating model
Audvera was built AI-first from the ground up — not a prompt box bolted onto a decade-old GRC core. AI drafts risks, procedures, and evidence conclusions, but every suggestion stays tied to its source, its decision, and its signoff. It's the linked record system audit teams need to move from research to reporting without losing the trail.
Auditors confirm scope, sample, and inputs before AI executes a procedure.
Every AI draft carries the sources, risks, and decisions it was built from.
Prepare, review, and signoff land on an append-only event log.
Workflow at a glance
One trail. Six steps. The audit graph carries context through every one of them.
Step 01 / 06
Scope, objectives, and engagement context in one record.
From
Launchpad
Next
Risks
Engagement record
Draft from intakeNIS2 2026 · Q1 fieldwork
Objectives
3
Risks scoped
5
Stakeholders
8
Why it changes the economics
Planning compresses. Evidence stays linked to the risk that named it. Review happens where the work happens. Reporting inherits the approved trail. Each step removes a class of rework — not just a manual chore.
3 days -> 18 min
Launchpad makes "Full plan built in 18 minutes" tangible: engagement foundation, procedure set, assignments, and data requests ready for review.
1 trail
Risk, control, test work, evidence, owner responses, exceptions, and approvals stay connected.
No rebuild
Report language inherits approved findings, linked support, management response, and signoff context.
THE COMPLETE AUDIT
Audvera keeps planning, fieldwork, evidence review, and report delivery in one connected workflow so teams move faster without losing audit discipline.
End-to-end workflow
One connected system for planning, execution, review, and final reporting.
Plan build
18 min
Linked evidence
142
Phase 01
1/5Define engagement scope, select control families, and rank risk themes in one guided screen.
Scope locked | expanding mandates without extra budget pressure
Budget-Scope Pressure (IIA Pulse 2025)
47%
audit teams report underfunding
Planning Time
-
from 3 days to 18 minutes
Spreadsheet Fire-Drill Fragmentation
0
evidence items linked, reviewed, and traceable
Report Delivery
-
Review the workflow
Select a phase to inspect the linked planning, fieldwork, review, and reporting trail.
The field's blind spots
The risk isn't whether AI drafts a paragraph. It's whether the team can defend coverage, source decisions, and prove review before the audit committee asks.
A prompt box cannot carry audit accountability. Audvera was built AI-first from the ground up: it loads scope, risks, controls, evidence, review comments, and standards context before AI drafts anything.
Engagement work and the controls catalog should not become two sources of truth. Audvera keeps risks, controls, procedures, and tests tied together while the audit moves.
AI can draft, but a CAE has to defend who accepted the work. Audvera records review gates, changes, comments, and signoff where the work happens.
The first value moment has to happen inside an audit workflow, not after a taxonomy cleanup. Audvera starts from a free assessment or demo context, then opens Launchpad with context attached.
From prompt to proof
Generate the risk assessment with your own scope. Open a 14-day trial with that context already loaded. Test the workflow your team will actually use — not a demo dataset that doesn't match your reality.
01
A buyer can generate a free AI risk assessment with their own context or start from the Launchpad demo. Both routes are designed to make the trial feel like real audit work, not an empty sandbox.
02
The assessment path captures an email unlock and the demo CTA can send the same no-card trial link. New users get full trial access; existing users are routed back into Launchpad with context ready.
03
Launchpad drafts objectives, procedures, data requests, interviews, owners, and candidate control links so the team edits judgment instead of starting from a blank document.
04
Starter and Team fit internal audit teams. Firm Starter and Firm Growth add multi-client workspaces, branded reports, and client portal workflows. Enterprise adds security, SSO, and custom rollout support.
Choose the buying path
Self-serve auditors get into the product fast, with real context. Teams and firms with procurement, security review, branded reporting, or client portals scope the rollout with sales.
Best for auditors who want hands-on proof before involving procurement. The topic field above creates the engagement skeleton and emails a signed 14-day trial link — no card, no procurement form.
Best when the decision includes multiple auditors, controls coverage, procurement, security review, or client-facing firm workflows. Team fits internal audit. Firm adds multi-client workspaces, branded reports, and client portal workflows.
Also available self-hosted
For audit teams that must keep audit work inside their own environment. Audvera Local is a single-tenant deployment you run on your infrastructure, connected to your own model-provider API keys. From $9,900/yr.
Honest about what self-hosted means
Not air-gapped. AI drafting still sends context to your chosen model provider on your own keys. You control the infrastructure and the keys; the AI calls go out to that provider under your account.
Self-hosted edition
Sales-gated. Provisioned per environment; not a self-serve checkout.
Buyer's committee
For CAEs, the real risk is not whether the demo looks clever. It is whether the system can improve audit work without weakening professional judgment.
They keep acceptance control. Drafts expose basis, linked sources, and reviewer decisions.
No. The proof starts with one engagement and the control relationships that matter for that scope.
Yes. The trial shows a narrow value path, then paid rollout adds users, engagements, and controls coverage.
No. The selling moment is work getting created, reviewed, and defended inside the audit flow.
Type the audit. Open a trial with the engagement skeleton already drafted. Give the audit committee a defensible path forward.