PCAOB AS 2110 · COSO ERM 2017 · IIA IPPF

Audit, on one graph.

Engagements run on the same model the controls registry queries. No reconciliation between two products that already had the same answer.

Try the live demo →
Engagement Workspace · Risk

Unauthorized journal entry posting

PCAOB AS 2110COSO ERM 2017
Linked Controls: 4Linked Risks: 2

promoted from engagement E-14 · provenance captured

Engagement-scoped RCM lens

C1
C2
C3
C4
R1
gap
R2
wait
R3
ineffective
R4
1 uncovered2 untested1 ineffective

Suggested controls (AI)

engagement objectives + risks loaded as context

Rank 1

Privileged-access ticket review (n=25 sample)

Rank 2

Segregation of duties: FRA vs SOX-relevant transactions

Rank 3

Quarterly access certification with management attestation

Suggestions cite IIA / COSO / PCAOB skills

"Reconciling four tools is not a job description."

— What the team said when they decided to build this.

THE AUDIT WEEK YOU RECOGNIZE

What's the part of your audit week that drives you crazy?

Pick a pain to see the product answer.

PILLAR ONE

Engagements that already know the risks.

Scoping fingerprint-matches risks from the registry. Fieldwork carries the linkage. Reporting inherits the chain.

Engagement journey

Risks linked at scoping. Test steps inherit context.

Planning starts from registry risks and engagement scope instead of a blank template. Each phase carries the same IDs into the work.

THE COMPLETE AUDIT

From risk selection to signed report - nothing leaves the platform.

Audvera keeps planning, fieldwork, evidence review, and report delivery in one connected workflow so teams move faster without losing audit discipline.

End-to-end workflow

One connected system for planning, execution, review, and final reporting.

Plan build

18 min

Linked evidence

142

Phase 01

1/5

Scope & risk priorities

Define engagement scope, select control families, and rank risk themes in one guided screen.

Scope locked | expanding mandates without extra budget pressure

Entity: Public
Engagement: Financial
Scope: FY2026
Controls: Revenue
Controls: ITGC
Controls: Procurement
RevenueThird-partyAccessJournal EntriesAI Governance

Budget-Scope Pressure (IIA Pulse 2025)

47%

audit teams report underfunding

Planning Time

-

from 3 days to 18 minutes

Spreadsheet Fire-Drill Fragmentation

0

evidence items linked, reviewed, and traceable

Report Delivery

-

Fieldwork & evidence

Evidence stays connected to the risk it answers.

Procedure lists, evidence, and review notes point back to the risk and control context that justified the work.

Fieldwork Workspace

Procedures, evidence, and reviewer notes in one workspace.

Every audit procedure links to its risk, evidence, and reviewer feedback — no spreadsheet side-quests.

audvera.com/engagements/FY2026-001/workspace

Active Procedures

4 items

Reporting inheritance

Findings carry the full chain to the report.

The report builder inherits the engagement, control, risk, evidence, and reviewer trail instead of rebuilding the story.

Reporting Workspace

Draft conclusions inherit full context automatically.

Findings link to source evidence and test procedures, while approved inclusions and engagement context flow into the draft automatically before reviewers sign off.

audvera.com/engagements/FY2026-001/workspace

Report Structure

Executive Summary
Scope & Methodology
Findings & Recommendations
Management Responses
Appendix: Evidence Index

Findings

"Standards literacy is a credibility signal. Or the absence of one."

— A consideration that surfaced during product definition.

PILLAR TWO

Controls that know the engagement they're being tested in.

The registry is the canonical source. The engagement view is a lens, not a copy. AI suggestions cite the standards skill packs the engagement is using.

Engagement-scoped RCM

Coverage gaps show in the view where testing happens.

The controls graph exposes uncovered, untested, and ineffective cells against the engagement scope without cloning the registry.

Engagement Workspace · Risk

Unauthorized journal entry posting

PCAOB AS 2110COSO ERM 2017
Linked Controls: 4Linked Risks: 2

promoted from engagement E-14 · provenance captured

Engagement-scoped RCM lens

C1
C2
C3
C4
R1
gap
R2
wait
R3
ineffective
R4
1 uncovered2 untested1 ineffective

Suggested controls (AI)

engagement objectives + risks loaded as context

Rank 1

Privileged-access ticket review (n=25 sample)

Rank 2

Segregation of duties: FRA vs SOX-relevant transactions

Rank 3

Quarterly access certification with management attestation

Suggestions cite IIA / COSO / PCAOB skills

Controls AI suggestion

Suggestions load the engagement context first.

Objectives, scope, linked risks, and the selected standards pack are present before a control suggestion is drafted.

Engagement context loaded

Controls AI suggestion

C-12

Privileged-access ticket review

Scope: PCAOB. Risks loaded: R47, R52. Last tested 2026-04-15.

Recommendation basiseffective

objectives

loaded first

scope

loaded first

risk links

loaded first

"There's a reason no one updates the GRC tool."

— Something every audit lead has learned.

One model. Two views. The reconciliation never happens because there's nothing to reconcile.

FY26 Q3 SOX - FRS Package

Engagement workspace

R47

Unauthorized journal entry posting

This audit

Inherent

9

Residual

4

PCAOB AS 2110Owner: S. Patel
Same Risk #47

Tenant register

Controls catalog

R47

Unauthorized journal entry posting

Shared

Inherent

9

Residual

4

PCAOB AS 21104 engagements

engagement_risks → risk_register

link table propagates

controls_ai_context

loads objectives + scope before suggesting

material_findings_chain

holds control + risk + engagement

Audvera was built by people who had the problem. Engagement workspace, controls registry, GRC tool, and the spreadsheet that actually got used because the three didn't talk. The product is what that workflow looks like when you stop pretending the engagement and the registry are different things.

— THE TEAM
SOC 2 TYPE IIISO 27001GDPR-alignedSTARTER FROM $999/MO. SEE PRICING →

Try Audvera before you commit to anything.

Open the live demo and walk through engagement scoping with a real controls graph.

Try the live demo →